| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpxx-jBbL4o_iJCcivFL2ei5a7PcWVfUaBmLu-q89Mkjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 20:01:16 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sandeep Tripathy <milun.tripathy@...il.com>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
Liush <liush@...winnertech.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 5/8] cpuidle: Factor-out power domain related code
from PSCI domain driver
On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 15:10, Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com> wrote:
>
> The generic power domain related code in PSCI domain driver is largely
> independent of PSCI and can be shared with RISC-V SBI domain driver
> hence we factor-out this code into dt_idle_genpd.c and dt_idle_genpd.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>
This is clearly a big step in the right direction. Just a couple minor
things, see more below.
Note that, I have a couple of patches in the pipe for the
cpuidle-psci-domain driver (not ready to be posted). I need a couple
of more days to confirm this restructuring still makes sense beyond
these potential new changes. I will let you know as soon as I can with
the outcome.
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/dt_idle_genpd.c b/drivers/cpuidle/dt_idle_genpd.c
I think it would be a good idea to add a new section for this to the
MAINTAINERS file. Perhaps a "DT IDLE DOMAIN" section? Or perhaps you
have another idea?
In any case, I am happy to continue with maintenance of this code,
even in the new restructured form.
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5a901773db60
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/dt_idle_genpd.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * PM domains for CPUs via genpd.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2019 Linaro Ltd.
> + * Author: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2021 Western Digital Corporation or its affiliates.
> + */
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "dt-idle-genpd: " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +
> +#include "dt_idle_genpd.h"
> +
> +static int dt_pd_parse_state_nodes(
> + int (*parse_state)(struct device_node *, u32 *),
> + struct genpd_power_state *states, int state_count)
> +{
> + int i, ret;
> + u32 state, *state_buf;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < state_count; i++) {
> + ret = parse_state(to_of_node(states[i].fwnode), &state);
> + if (ret)
> + goto free_state;
> +
> + state_buf = kmalloc(sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!state_buf) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto free_state;
> + }
> + *state_buf = state;
> + states[i].data = state_buf;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +free_state:
> + i--;
> + for (; i >= 0; i--)
> + kfree(states[i].data);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int dt_pd_parse_states(struct device_node *np,
> + int (*parse_state)(struct device_node *, u32 *),
> + struct genpd_power_state **states,
> + int *state_count)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Parse the domain idle states. */
> + ret = of_genpd_parse_idle_states(np, states, state_count);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Fill out the dt specifics for each found state. */
> + ret = dt_pd_parse_state_nodes(parse_state, *states, *state_count);
> + if (ret)
> + kfree(*states);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void dt_pd_free_states(struct genpd_power_state *states,
> + unsigned int state_count)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < state_count; i++)
> + kfree(states[i].data);
> + kfree(states);
> +}
> +
> +void dt_pd_free(struct generic_pm_domain *pd)
> +{
> + dt_pd_free_states(pd->states, pd->state_count);
> + kfree(pd->name);
> + kfree(pd);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dt_pd_free);
> +
> +struct generic_pm_domain *dt_pd_alloc(struct device_node *np,
> + int (*parse_state)(struct device_node *, u32 *))
> +{
> + struct generic_pm_domain *pd;
> + struct genpd_power_state *states = NULL;
> + int ret, state_count = 0;
> +
> + pd = kzalloc(sizeof(*pd), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pd)
> + goto out;
> +
> + pd->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
> + if (!pd->name)
> + goto free_pd;
> +
> + /*
> + * Parse the domain idle states and let genpd manage the state selection
> + * for those being compatible with "domain-idle-state".
> + */
> + ret = dt_pd_parse_states(np, parse_state, &states, &state_count);
> + if (ret)
> + goto free_name;
> +
> + pd->free_states = dt_pd_free_states;
> + pd->name = kbasename(pd->name);
> + pd->states = states;
> + pd->state_count = state_count;
> +
> + pr_debug("alloc PM domain %s\n", pd->name);
> + return pd;
> +
> +free_name:
> + kfree(pd->name);
> +free_pd:
> + kfree(pd);
> +out:
> + pr_err("failed to alloc PM domain %pOF\n", np);
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dt_pd_alloc);
> +
> +int dt_pd_init_topology(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> + struct device_node *node;
> + struct of_phandle_args child, parent;
> + int ret;
> +
> + for_each_child_of_node(np, node) {
> + if (of_parse_phandle_with_args(node, "power-domains",
> + "#power-domain-cells", 0, &parent))
> + continue;
> +
> + child.np = node;
> + child.args_count = 0;
> + ret = of_genpd_add_subdomain(&parent, &child);
> + of_node_put(parent.np);
> + if (ret) {
> + of_node_put(node);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dt_pd_init_topology);
May I suggest that we stick to dt_idle_* as the prefix for all of the
exported functions in this file. Static functions can just skip the
prefix altogether.
> +
> +struct device *dt_idle_genpd_attach_cpu(int cpu, const char *name)
> +{
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + dev = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(get_cpu_device(cpu), name);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev))
> + return dev;
> +
> + pm_runtime_irq_safe(dev);
> + if (cpu_online(cpu))
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> +
> + dev_pm_syscore_device(dev, true);
> +
> + return dev;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dt_idle_genpd_attach_cpu);
> +
> +void dt_idle_genpd_detach_cpu(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev))
> + return;
> +
> + dev_pm_domain_detach(dev, false);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dt_idle_genpd_detach_cpu);
Again, a minor comment on the naming of the functions. How about
skipping "genpd" in the prefix, thus just dt_idle_attach|detach_cpu()?
[...]
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists