[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Ve-8ALxeNwYDdXkZndahv0PY8P=VdHKkKJR=2=suo8L6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 10:49:38 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mfd: Add RTL8231 core device
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 12:28 AM Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 00:18 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:28 PM Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > The RTL8231 is implemented as an MDIO device, and provides a regmap
> > > interface for register access by the core and child devices.
> > >
> > > The chip can also be a device on an SMI bus, an I2C-like bus by Realtek.
> > > Since kernel support for SMI is limited, and no real-world SMI
> > > implementations have been encountered for this device, this is currently
> > > unimplemented. The use of the regmap interface should make any future
> > > support relatively straightforward.
> > >
> > > After reset, all pins are muxed to GPIO inputs before the pin drivers
> > > are enabled. This is done to prevent accidental system resets, when a
> > > pin is connected to the parent SoC's reset line.
> >
> > > [missing MDIO_BUS dependency, provided via REGMAP_MDIO]
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> >
> > What is the culprit? Shouldn't this have a Fixes tag?
>
> But it doesn't actually fix an issue created by an existing commit, just
> something that was wrong in the first version of the patch.
Then why is it in the tag block?
If you want to give a credit to LKP, do it in the comments block
(after '---' cutter line).
> This patch is not
> dedicated to fixing that single issue though, it's just a part of it. Hence the
> note above the Reported-by tag.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists