linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mfd: Add RTL8231 core device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 24 May 2021 10:04:38 +0200
From:   Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mfd: Add RTL8231 core device

On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 10:55 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 10:50 AM Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 00:18 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:28 PM Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > > +       err = regmap_read(map, RTL8231_REG_FUNC1, &v);
> > > 
> > > > +       ready_code = FIELD_GET(RTL8231_FUNC1_READY_CODE_MASK, v);
> > > 
> > > If we got an error why we need a read_core, what for?
> > 
> > The chip has a static 5-bit field in register 0x01, called READY_CODE
> > according
> > to the datasheet. If a device is present, and a read from register 0x01
> > succeeds, I still check that this field has the correct value. For the
> > RTL8231,
> > it should return 0x37. If this isn't the case, I assume this isn't an
> > RTL8231,
> > so the driver probe stops and returns an error value.
> 
> Right. And why do you get ready_code if you know that there is an error?

This has changed in v3. I now check if there was an error reading the register,
and return if there was. Only if there wasn't an error, the code continues to
extract and verify the READY_CODE value.

Best,
Sander