linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] dt-bindings: dvfs: Add support for generic performance domains

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210524100456.iqh2rqefrjd25ems@bogus>
Date:   Mon, 24 May 2021 11:05:08 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@...iatek.com>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dt-bindings: dvfs: Add support for generic
 performance domains

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 02:47:15PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 21-05-21, 16:24, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 09:38:34AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 20-05-21, 14:43, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > Not allowed because I can't turn this check on by default until we get
> > > > rid of the existing 80 or so. But it is a new check and Viresh already
> > > > applied, so oh well.
> > >
> > > I can always drop it :)
> > >
> > 
> > While I really don't care(evident by rate at which I worked on this 😉)
> > I think Hector Yuan won't be happy to wait I guess. As a quick fix, you
> > can update "qcom,cpufreq-hw" to "mediatek,cpufreq-hw". You will still
> > get warning with this patch + update alone, but once you have Hector's
> > mediatek cpufreq driver applied, the warnings must disappear.
> > 
> > What do you think ?
> 
> I guess you can send a fix later then.

Sure 😄

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep