[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a663bde-c301-d326-2b19-ca52719a5855@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 06:42:53 -0700
From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>,
Rafael J Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] x86/acpi, x86/boot: Add multiprocessor wake-up
support
On 5/23/21 11:40 PM, Mika Penttilä wrote:
>
> So this isn't supporting suspend/resume if AP cannot started again?
Yes. You are correct. It can be used only once per AP. Please find the
spec reference below.
/*
* According to the ACPI specification r6.4, sec 5.2.12.19, the
* mailbox-based wakeup mechanism cannot be used more than once
* for the same CPU, so skip sending wake commands to already
* awake CPU.
*/
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists