[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YK0nGozm4PRPv6D7@google.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 16:34:34 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: "Stamatis, Ilias" <ilstam@...zon.com>,
"mlevitsk@...hat.com" <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>,
"Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"mtosatti@...hat.com" <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
"zamsden@...il.com" <zamsden@...il.com>,
"wanpengli@...cent.com" <wanpengli@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/12] KVM: VMX: Remove vmx->current_tsc_ratio and
decache_tsc_multiplier()
On Tue, May 25, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/05/21 17:58, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > The right place for the hw multiplier
> > > field to be updated is inside set_tsc_khz() in common code when the ratio
> > > changes.
>
> Sort of, the problem is that you have two VMCS's to update. If properly
> fixed, the cache is useful to fix the issue with KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ needing to
> update both of them. For that to work, you'd have to move the cache to
> struct loaded_vmcs.
vmcs01 and vmcs02 will get updated at enter/exit, if there's no caching then
it all Just Works.
> So you can:
>
> 1) move the cached tsc_ratio to struct loaded_vmcs
>
> 2) add a function in common code (update_tsc_parameters or something like
> that) to update both the offset and the ratio depending on is_guest_mode()
>
> 3) call that function from nested vmentry/vmexit
>
> And at that point the cache will do its job and figure out whether a vmwrite
> is needed, on both vmentry and vmexit.
>
> I actually like the idea of storing the expected value in kvm_vcpu and the
> current value in loaded_vmcs. We might use it for other things such as
> reload_vmcs01_apic_access_page perhaps.
I'm not necessarily opposed to aggressively shadowing the VMCS, but if we go
that route then it should be a standalone series that implements a framework
that can be easily extended to arbitrary fields. Adding fields to loaded_vmcs
one at a time will be tedious and error prone. E.g. what makes TSC_MULTIPLIER
more special than TSC_OFFSET, GUEST_IA32_PAT, GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL, GUEST_BNDCFGS,
and other number of fields that are likely to persist for a given vmcs02?
The current caching logic is just plain ugly and should not exist.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists