lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f572997b-8979-26bb-cb3b-9926086c4cc7@acm.org>
Date:   Tue, 25 May 2021 09:44:26 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc:     0day robot <lkp@...el.com>, John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
        ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com, zhengjun.xing@...el.com,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: 2463a604a8: netperf.Throughput_tps 12.8% improvement

On 5/24/21 11:44 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed a 12.8% improvement of netperf.Throughput_tps due to commit:
> 
> commit: 2463a604a86728777ce4284214a52de46a808c9e ("[PATCH v3 2/3] Introduce enums for the SAM, message, host and driver status codes")
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Bart-Van-Assche/Introduce-enums-for-SCSI-status-codes/20210524-105751
> base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git for-next
> 
> in testcase: netperf
> on test machine: 192 threads 4 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 9242 CPU @ 2.30GHz with 192G memory
> with following parameters:
> 
> 	ip: ipv4
> 	runtime: 300s
> 	nr_threads: 16
> 	cluster: cs-localhost
> 	test: TCP_CRR
> 	cpufreq_governor: performance
> 	ucode: 0x5003006
> 
> test-description: Netperf is a benchmark that can be use to measure various aspect of networking performance.
> test-url: http://www.netperf.org/netperf/

The above email reports a performance improvement for the networking
subsystem while my patch only affects the SCSI subsystem and should not
have any performance impact. I'm confused by the above feedback ...

Bart.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ