linux-kernel - [PATCH] nfc: st-nci: remove unnecessary labels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210525031254.12196-1-samirweng1979@163.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 May 2021 11:12:54 +0800
From:   samirweng1979 <samirweng1979@....com>
To:     krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     linux-nfc@...ts.01.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>
Subject: [PATCH] nfc: st-nci: remove unnecessary labels

From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>

In some functions, use goto exit statement, which just return r.
and exit label only used once in each funciton, so we use return
to replace goto statement and remove exit label.

Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>
---
 drivers/nfc/st-nci/vendor_cmds.c | 15 +++++----------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st-nci/vendor_cmds.c b/drivers/nfc/st-nci/vendor_cmds.c
index c6a9d30..94b6000 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/st-nci/vendor_cmds.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st-nci/vendor_cmds.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static int st_nci_hci_dm_get_info(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 	r = nci_hci_send_cmd(ndev, ST_NCI_DEVICE_MGNT_GATE, ST_NCI_HCI_DM_GETINFO,
 			     data, data_len, &skb);
 	if (r)
-		goto exit;
+		return r;
 
 	msg = nfc_vendor_cmd_alloc_reply_skb(dev, ST_NCI_VENDOR_OUI,
 					     HCI_DM_GET_INFO, skb->len);
@@ -117,7 +117,6 @@ static int st_nci_hci_dm_get_info(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 
 free_skb:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
-exit:
 	return r;
 }
 
@@ -131,7 +130,7 @@ static int st_nci_hci_dm_get_data(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 	r = nci_hci_send_cmd(ndev, ST_NCI_DEVICE_MGNT_GATE, ST_NCI_HCI_DM_GETDATA,
 			     data, data_len, &skb);
 	if (r)
-		goto exit;
+		return r;
 
 	msg = nfc_vendor_cmd_alloc_reply_skb(dev, ST_NCI_VENDOR_OUI,
 					     HCI_DM_GET_DATA, skb->len);
@@ -150,7 +149,6 @@ static int st_nci_hci_dm_get_data(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 
 free_skb:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
-exit:
 	return r;
 }
 
@@ -216,7 +214,7 @@ static int st_nci_hci_get_param(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 
 	r = nci_hci_get_param(ndev, param->gate, param->data, &skb);
 	if (r)
-		goto exit;
+		return r;
 
 	msg = nfc_vendor_cmd_alloc_reply_skb(dev, ST_NCI_VENDOR_OUI,
 					     HCI_GET_PARAM, skb->len);
@@ -235,7 +233,6 @@ static int st_nci_hci_get_param(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 
 free_skb:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
-exit:
 	return r;
 }
 
@@ -262,7 +259,7 @@ static int st_nci_hci_dm_vdc_measurement_value(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 			     ST_NCI_HCI_DM_VDC_MEASUREMENT_VALUE,
 			     data, data_len, &skb);
 	if (r)
-		goto exit;
+		return r;
 
 	msg = nfc_vendor_cmd_alloc_reply_skb(dev, ST_NCI_VENDOR_OUI,
 				HCI_DM_VDC_MEASUREMENT_VALUE, skb->len);
@@ -281,7 +278,6 @@ static int st_nci_hci_dm_vdc_measurement_value(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 
 free_skb:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
-exit:
 	return r;
 }
 
@@ -299,7 +295,7 @@ static int st_nci_hci_dm_vdc_value_comparison(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 			     ST_NCI_HCI_DM_VDC_VALUE_COMPARISON,
 			     data, data_len, &skb);
 	if (r)
-		goto exit;
+		return r;
 
 	msg = nfc_vendor_cmd_alloc_reply_skb(dev, ST_NCI_VENDOR_OUI,
 					HCI_DM_VDC_VALUE_COMPARISON, skb->len);
@@ -318,7 +314,6 @@ static int st_nci_hci_dm_vdc_value_comparison(struct nfc_dev *dev, void *data,
 
 free_skb:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
-exit:
 	return r;
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1