lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 25 May 2021 14:15:56 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
        Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@...il.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...obroma-systems.com>,
        Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christian König 
        <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] rockpro64: PCI BAR reassignment broken by commit
 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource flags for 64-bit
 memory addresses")

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 05:54:56PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 17:34, Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com> wrote:

> > > > >> > On 2021-05-18 10:09, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> > > > >> >> [..]
> > > > >> >> [    0.305183] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: host bridge /pcie@...00000 ranges:
> > > > >> >> [    0.305248] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie:      MEM 0x00fa000000..0x00fbdfffff -> 0x00fa000000
> > > > >> >> [    0.305285] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie:       IO 0x00fbe00000..0x00fbefffff -> 0x00fbe00000
> > > > >> >> [    0.373705] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> > > > >> >> [    0.373730] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-1f]
> > > > >> >> [    0.373751] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xfa000000-0xfbdfffff 64bit]
> > > > >> >> [    0.373777] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x0000-0xfffff] (bus address [0xfbe00000-0xfbefffff])

> ... For some reason, lspci translates the BAR values to CPU
> addresses, but the PCI side addresses are within 32-bits.

lspci shows BARs as CPU physical addresses by default.  These are the
same addresses you would see in pdev->resource[n] and the same as BAR
values you would see in dmesg.

A 64-bit CPU physical address can certainly be translated by the host
bridge to a 32-bit PCI address.  But that's not happening here because
this host bridge applies no translation (CPU physical 0xfa000000 maps
to bus address 0xfa000000).

"lspci -b" shows the PCI bus addresses.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ