linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: Fix a typo in Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 May 2021 14:06:26 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Haocheng Xie <xiehaocheng.cn@...il.com>
Cc:     josh@...htriplett.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
        joel@...lfernandes.org, corbet@....net, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Fix a typo in Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 05:31:52PM +0800, Haocheng Xie wrote:
> Add the missing ')' in the documentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Haocheng Xie <xiehaocheng.cn@...il.com>

Good eyes!  Queued for further review and testing, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst b/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst
> index 7148e9b..a9381e43 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst
> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ is the number that had executed since boot at the time that this CPU
>  last noted the beginning of a grace period, which might be the current
>  (stalled) grace period, or it might be some earlier grace period (for
>  example, if the CPU might have been in dyntick-idle mode for an extended
> -time period.  The number after the "/" is the number that have executed
> +time period).  The number after the "/" is the number that have executed
>  since boot until the current time.  If this latter number stays constant
>  across repeated stall-warning messages, it is possible that RCU's softirq
>  handlers are no longer able to execute on this CPU.  This can happen if
> -- 
> 2.9.5
>