| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 15:45:31 -0700
From: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>, Wang Yugui <wangyugui@...-tech.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH 2/2] mm: thp: check page_mapped instead of
page_mapcount for split
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 3:06 PM Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 May 2021, Yang Shi wrote:
>
> > When debugging the bug reported by Wang Yugui [1], try_to_unmap() may
> > return false positive for PTE-mapped THP since page_mapcount() is used
> > to check if the THP is unmapped, but it just checks compound mapount and
> > head page's mapcount. If the THP is PTE-mapped and head page is not
> > mapped, it may return false positive.
>
> But those false positives did not matter because there was a separate
> DEBUG_VM check later.
>
> It's good to have the link to Wang Yugui's report, but that paragraph
> is not really about this patch, as it has evolved now: this patch
> consolidates the two DEBUG_VM checks into one VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE.
>
> >
> > The try_to_unmap() has been changed to void function, so check
> > page_mapped() after it. And changed BUG_ON to WARN_ON since it is not a
> > fatal issue.
>
> The change from DEBUG_VM BUG to VM_WARN_ON_ONCE is the most important
> part of this, and the reason it's good for stable: and the patch title
> ought to highlight that, not the page_mapcount business.
Will update the subject and the commit log accordingly.
>
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210412180659.B9E3.409509F4@e16-tech.com/
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
>
> This will be required Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> (but we don't want to Cc them on this mail).
>
> As I said on the other, I think this should be 1/2 not 2/2.
Sure.
>
> > ---
> > v3: Incorporated the comments from Hugh. Keep Zi Yan's reviewed-by tag
> > since there is no fundamental change against v2.
> > v2: Removed dead code and updated the comment of try_to_unmap() per Zi
> > Yan.
> > mm/huge_memory.c | 17 +++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index 80fe642d742d..72d81d8e01b1 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -2343,6 +2343,8 @@ static void unmap_page(struct page *page)
> > ttu_flags |= TTU_SPLIT_FREEZE;
> >
> > try_to_unmap(page, ttu_flags);
> > +
> > + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE(page_mapped(page), page);
>
> There is one useful piece of information that dump_page() will not show:
> total_mapcount(page). Is there a way of crafting that into the output?
>
> Not with the macros available, I think. Maybe we should be optimistic
> and assume I already have the fixes, so not worth trying to refine the
> message (but I'm not entirely convinced of that!).
>
> The trouble with
> if (VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE(page_mapped(page), page))
> pr_warn("total_mapcount:%d\n", total_mapcount(page));
> is that it's printed regardless of the ONCEness. Another "trouble"
> is that it's printed so long after the page_mapped(page) check that
> it may be 0 by now - but one can see that as itself informative.
We should be able to make dump_page() print total mapcount, right? The
dump_page() should be just called in some error paths so taking some
extra overhead to dump more information seems harmless, or am I
missing something? Of course, this can be done in a separate patch.
>
> I guess leave it as you have it, I don't see an easy better
> (without going back to something like the old contortions).
>
> > }
> >
> > static void remap_page(struct page *page, unsigned int nr)
> > @@ -2653,7 +2655,7 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page *page, struct list_head *list)
> > struct deferred_split *ds_queue = get_deferred_split_queue(head);
> > struct anon_vma *anon_vma = NULL;
> > struct address_space *mapping = NULL;
> > - int count, mapcount, extra_pins, ret;
> > + int mapcount, extra_pins, ret;
>
> Remove mapcount too.
>
> > pgoff_t end;
> >
> > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(is_huge_zero_page(head), head);
> > @@ -2712,7 +2714,6 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page *page, struct list_head *list)
> > }
> >
> > unmap_page(head);
> > - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(compound_mapcount(head), head);
> >
> > /* block interrupt reentry in xa_lock and spinlock */
> > local_irq_disable();
> > @@ -2730,7 +2731,6 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page *page, struct list_head *list)
> >
> > /* Prevent deferred_split_scan() touching ->_refcount */
> > spin_lock(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
> > - count = page_count(head);
> > mapcount = total_mapcount(head);
> > if (!mapcount && page_ref_freeze(head, 1 + extra_pins)) {
>
> mapcount was useful for printing in the hand-crafted message deleted,
> but serves no purpose now: just do the page_ref_freeze() without it.
Aha, yes, good catch. If mapcount is not zero, the refcount freeze
won't succeed.
>
> > if (!list_empty(page_deferred_list(head))) {
> > @@ -2752,16 +2752,9 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page *page, struct list_head *list)
> > __split_huge_page(page, list, end);
> > ret = 0;
> > } else {
> > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM) && mapcount) {
> > - pr_alert("total_mapcount: %u, page_count(): %u\n",
> > - mapcount, count);
> > - if (PageTail(page))
> > - dump_page(head, NULL);
> > - dump_page(page, "total_mapcount(head) > 0");
> > - BUG();
> > - }
> > spin_unlock(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
> > -fail: if (mapping)
> > +fail:
> > + if (mapping)
> > xa_unlock(&mapping->i_pages);
> > local_irq_enable();
> > remap_page(head, thp_nr_pages(head));
> > --
> > 2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists