[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <162191580948.24013.704618312560321536.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 04:10:09 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@...il.com>
Cc: kafai@...com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, dledford@...hat.com, jgg@...pe.ca,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] samples: bpf: ix kernel-doc syntax in file header
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Sun, 23 May 2021 20:44:08 +0530 you wrote:
> The opening comment mark '/**' is used for highlighting the beginning of
> kernel-doc comments.
> The header for samples/bpf/ibumad_kern.c follows this syntax, but
> the content inside does not comply with kernel-doc.
>
> This line was probably not meant for kernel-doc parsing, but is parsed
> due to the presence of kernel-doc like comment syntax(i.e, '/**'), which
> causes unexpected warnings from kernel-doc:
> warning: This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
> * ibumad BPF sample kernel side
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v2] samples: bpf: ix kernel-doc syntax in file header
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/4ce7d68beb9e
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists