linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add DHCOM PicoITX and DHCOM DRC02 boards [Klartext]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOMZO5CaK5mJpDp7-ak3Q08ErWrfBQ-xCgOPpqD+rH_yT1Ok8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 May 2021 21:10:38 -0300
From:   Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:     Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@...electronics.com>
Cc:     "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        kernel <kernel@...electronics.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add DHCOM PicoITX and DHCOM DRC02
 boards [Klartext]

Hi Christoph,

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 7:39 PM Christoph Niedermaier
<cniedermaier@...electronics.com> wrote:

> My thought was to be future proof. If there is no match with the Solo now,
> it will fall back to the i.MX6 DualLite. That is why I added both fsl,imx6s
> and fsl,imx6dl in this order.
>
> Should I remove the line with fsl,imx6s?

Yes, please.

Thanks