[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210525071259.j5g7koxqad7hwpkp@beryllium.lan>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 09:12:59 +0200
From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: Use NN for max_namespaces if MNAN is zero
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 09:37:03AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I think we should add a sanity check for that and reject the broken
> controller if that is not the case rather than working around it.
Alright. I understood from the spec, that in the non ANA case the NN
field should still be case though?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists