[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210525074426.GA14916@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 09:44:26 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Koba Ko <koba.ko@...onical.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Henrik Juul Hansen <hjhansen2020@...il.com>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: Avoid to go into d3cold if device can't use
npss.
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:33:15AM +0800, Koba Ko wrote:
> After resume, host can't change power state of the closed controller
> from D3cold to D0.
Why?
> For these devices, just avoid to go deeper than d3hot.
What are "these devices"?
> @@ -2958,6 +2959,15 @@ static int nvme_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>
> dev_info(dev->ctrl.device, "pci function %s\n", dev_name(&pdev->dev));
>
> + if (pm_suspend_via_firmware() || !dev->ctrl.npss ||
> + !pcie_aspm_enabled(pdev) ||
> + dev->nr_host_mem_descs ||
> + (dev->ctrl.quirks & NVME_QUIRK_SIMPLE_SUSPEND)) {
Before we start open coding this in even more places we really want a
little helper function for these checks, which should be accomodated with
the comment near the existing copy of the checks.
> + pdev->d3cold_allowed = false;
> + pci_d3cold_disable(pdev);
> + pm_runtime_resume(&pdev->dev);
Why do we need to both set d3cold_allowed and call pci_d3cold_disable?
What is the pm_runtime_resume doing here?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists