[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0db36d1-3ad0-ffc7-02ab-dabab346dae9@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 09:55:09 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dongas86@...il.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] mm: rename the global section array to mem_sections
On 17.05.21 13:20, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> In order to distinguish the struct mem_section for a better code
> readability and align with kernel doc [1] name below, change the
> global mem section name to 'mem_sections' from 'mem_section'.
>
> [1] Documentation/vm/memory-model.rst
> "The `mem_section` objects are arranged in a two-dimensional array
> called `mem_sections`."
>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
> Cc: kexec@...ts.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>
> ---
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 10 +++++-----
> kernel/crash_core.c | 4 ++--
> mm/sparse.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index fc23e36cb165..b348a06915c5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -1297,9 +1297,9 @@ struct mem_section {
> #define SECTION_ROOT_MASK (SECTIONS_PER_ROOT - 1)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME
> -extern struct mem_section **mem_section;
> +extern struct mem_section **mem_sections;
> #else
> -extern struct mem_section mem_section[NR_SECTION_ROOTS][SECTIONS_PER_ROOT];
> +extern struct mem_section mem_sections[NR_SECTION_ROOTS][SECTIONS_PER_ROOT];
> #endif
>
> static inline unsigned long *section_to_usemap(struct mem_section *ms)
> @@ -1310,12 +1310,12 @@ static inline unsigned long *section_to_usemap(struct mem_section *ms)
> static inline struct mem_section *__nr_to_section(unsigned long nr)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME
> - if (!mem_section)
> + if (!mem_sections)
> return NULL;
> #endif
> - if (!mem_section[SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr)])
> + if (!mem_sections[SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr)])
> return NULL;
> - return &mem_section[SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr)][nr & SECTION_ROOT_MASK];
> + return &mem_sections[SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr)][nr & SECTION_ROOT_MASK];
> }
> extern unsigned long __section_nr(struct mem_section *ms);
> extern size_t mem_section_usage_size(void);
> diff --git a/kernel/crash_core.c b/kernel/crash_core.c
> index 29cc15398ee4..fb1180d81b5a 100644
> --- a/kernel/crash_core.c
> +++ b/kernel/crash_core.c
> @@ -414,8 +414,8 @@ static int __init crash_save_vmcoreinfo_init(void)
> VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(contig_page_data);
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
> - VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL_ARRAY(mem_section);
> - VMCOREINFO_LENGTH(mem_section, NR_SECTION_ROOTS);
> + VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL_ARRAY(mem_sections);
> + VMCOREINFO_LENGTH(mem_sections, NR_SECTION_ROOTS);
> VMCOREINFO_STRUCT_SIZE(mem_section);
> VMCOREINFO_OFFSET(mem_section, section_mem_map);
> VMCOREINFO_NUMBER(MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS);
> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index df4418c12f04..a96e7e65475f 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -24,12 +24,12 @@
> * 1) mem_section - memory sections, mem_map's for valid memory
> */
> #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME
> -struct mem_section **mem_section;
> +struct mem_section **mem_sections;
> #else
> -struct mem_section mem_section[NR_SECTION_ROOTS][SECTIONS_PER_ROOT]
> +struct mem_section mem_sections[NR_SECTION_ROOTS][SECTIONS_PER_ROOT]
> ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
> #endif
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(mem_section);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mem_sections);
>
> #ifdef NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS
> /*
> @@ -91,14 +91,14 @@ static int __meminit sparse_index_init(unsigned long section_nr, int nid)
> *
> * The mem_hotplug_lock resolves the apparent race below.
> */
> - if (mem_section[root])
> + if (mem_sections[root])
> return 0;
>
> section = sparse_index_alloc(nid);
> if (!section)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - mem_section[root] = section;
> + mem_sections[root] = section;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ unsigned long __section_nr(struct mem_section *ms)
> #else
> unsigned long __section_nr(struct mem_section *ms)
> {
> - return (unsigned long)(ms - mem_section[0]);
> + return (unsigned long)(ms - mem_sections[0]);
> }
> #endif
>
> @@ -286,8 +286,8 @@ static void __init memblocks_present(void)
> #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME
> size = sizeof(struct mem_section *) * NR_SECTION_ROOTS;
> align = 1 << (INTERNODE_CACHE_SHIFT);
> - mem_section = memblock_alloc(size, align);
> - if (!mem_section)
> + mem_sections = memblock_alloc(size, align);
> + if (!mem_sections)
> panic("%s: Failed to allocate %lu bytes align=0x%lx\n",
> __func__, size, align);
> #endif
>
Smells like unnecessary code churn. I'd rather just fix the doc because
it doesn't really improve readability IMHO.
Anyhow, just my 2 cents.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists