[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YKy516IKPfsZj3cY@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 10:48:23 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, qperret@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ionela.voinescu@....com,
lukasz.luba@....com, dietmar.eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] PM / EM: Skip inefficient OPPs
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 05:54:24PM +0100, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index 4f09afd..5a91a2b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>
> #include "sched.h"
>
> +#include <linux/energy_model.h>
> #include <linux/sched/cpufreq.h>
> #include <trace/events/power.h>
>
> @@ -153,6 +154,9 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy,
>
> freq = map_util_freq(util, freq, max);
>
> + /* Avoid inefficient performance states */
> + freq = em_pd_get_efficient_freq(em_cpu_get(policy->cpu), freq);
> +
> if (freq == sg_policy->cached_raw_freq && !sg_policy->need_freq_update)
> return sg_policy->next_freq;
>
This seems somewhat unfortunate, it adds a loop over the OPPs only to
then call into cpufreq to do the exact same thing again :/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists