[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJF2gTRA=tUid7akgVXfk6MHOd0KmJpDQEZ2m9wRfhigBDzQTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 17:28:21 +0800
From: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] riscv: Fixup PAGE_UP in asm/page.h
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 2:34 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 06:51:07AM +0000, guoren@...nel.org wrote:
> > From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> >
> > Current PAGE_UP implementation is wrong. PAGE_UP(0) should be
> > 0x1000, but current implementation will give out 0.
> >
> > Although the current PAGE_UP isn't used, it will soon be used in
> > tlb_flush optimization.
>
> Nak. Please just remove the PAGE_UP/PAGE_DOWN macros just like they
> have been removed from other architectures long ago and use the
> generic DIV_ROUND_UP macro for your new code like everyone else.
This patch has been dropped because it's wrong, ref Anup's reply.
Remove PAGE_UP/DOWN is okay for me. How about:
static inline void local_flush_tlb_range_asid(unsigned long start,
unsigned long size,
unsigned long asid)
{
- unsigned long page_add = PAGE_DOWN(start);
- unsigned long page_end = PAGE_UP(start + size);
+ unsigned long page_add = _ALIGN_DOWN(start, PAGE_SIZE);
+ unsigned long page_end = _ALIGN_UP(start + size, PAGE_SIZE);
_ALIGN_XXX are also defined in arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h.
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists