[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tumr82ri.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 13:35:29 +0200
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] printk: Straighten out log_flags into printk_info_flags
On 2021-05-25, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h
>> index 73cc80e01cef..71918d47ca95 100644
>> --- a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h
>> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h
>> @@ -50,6 +50,12 @@ struct prb_data_blk_lpos {
>> unsigned long next;
>> };
>>
>> +/* Flags for a single printk record. */
>> +enum printk_info_flags {
>> + LOG_NEWLINE = 2, /* text ended with a newline */
>> + LOG_CONT = 8, /* text is a fragment of a continuation line */
>> +};
>
> Nit: Could you please move this after "enum desc_state" declaration?
Is there a reason that this enum is moved into printk_ringbuffer.h? The
ringbuffer does not use this enum.
John Ogness
Powered by blists - more mailing lists