[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210525115451.GO30378@techsingularity.net>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 12:54:51 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 05/26] mm, slub: extract get_partial() from
new_slab_objects()
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 01:39:25AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> The later patches will need more fine grained control over individual actions
> in ___slab_alloc(), the only caller of new_slab_objects(), so this is a first
> preparatory step with no functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> <SNIP>
> @@ -2748,6 +2743,10 @@ static void *___slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int node,
> goto redo;
> }
>
> + freelist = get_partial(s, gfpflags, node, c);
> + if (freelist)
> + goto check_new_page;
> +
> freelist = new_slab_objects(s, gfpflags, node, &c);
>
> if (unlikely(!freelist)) {
It's a nit-pick, but why did you not simply do something like this
instead of the goto?
freelist = get_partial(s, gfpflags, node, c);
if (!freelist)
freelist = new_slab_objects(s, gfpflags, node, &c);
if (unlikely(!freelist))
...
If nothing else, the label may be misleading because c->page may not
be new.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists