lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 25 May 2021 15:20:35 +0200
From:   Krzysztof WilczyƄski <kw@...ux.com>
To:     Lambert Wang <lambert.q.wang@...il.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: add pci_dev_is_alive API

Hi Lambert,

Thank you for sending the patch over!

To match the style of other patches you'd need to capitalise "PCI" in
the subject, see the following for some examples:

 $ git log --oneline drivers/pci/pci.c 

Also, it might be worth mentioning in the subject that this is a new API
that will be added.

> Device drivers use this API to proactively check if the device
> is alive or not. It is helpful for some PCI devices to detect
> surprise removal and do recovery when Hotplug function is disabled.
> 
> Note: Device in power states larger than D0 is also treated not alive
> by this function.
[...]

Question to you: do you have any particular users of this new API in
mind?  Or is this solving some problem you've seen and/or reported via
the kernel Bugzilla?

> +/**
> + * pci_dev_is_alive - check the pci device is alive or not
> + * @pdev: the PCI device

That would be "PCI" in the function brief above.  Also, try to be
consistent and capitalise everything plus add missing periods, see the
following for an example on how to write kernel-doc:

  https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html#function-documentation

> + * Device drivers use this API to proactively check if the device
> + * is alive or not. It is helpful for some PCI devices to detect
> + * surprise removal and do recovery when Hotplug function is disabled.

As per my question above - what users of this new API do you have in
mind?  Are they any other patches pending adding users of this API?

> + * Note: Device in power state larger than D0 is also treated not alive
> + * by this function.
> + *
> + * Returns true if the device is alive.
> + */
> +bool pci_dev_is_alive(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	u16 vendor;
> +
> +	pci_read_config_word(pdev, PCI_VENDOR_ID, &vendor);
> +
> +	return vendor == pdev->vendor;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_dev_is_alive);

Why not use the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()?

	Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ