[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <79f227c4-5ed6-23e8-2d74-3197871359f8@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 15:52:51 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/fb-helper: improve DRM fbdev emulation device names
Hello,
On 5/25/21 3:34 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> If you guys with your distro hats on all think it doesn't matter, then
>> yeah I'm all for dropping the somewhat silly -drm or drmfb suffixes. I
>> think that was just way back so it's easier to know you've loaded the
>> right driver, back when there was both drm and native fbdev drivers
>> around. But now I think for new hw there's only drm, so should be all
>> fine.
>
> Suse doesn't use fbdev, except for some outliers; most notably hypervfb
> and generic efifb/vesafb. Both are now being replaced with drm code.
> From what I've seen, it's the same for other distros. And X11 checks
> for the existence of device files anyway IIRC.
Yes, I believe is the same for us.
I'll post a patch to just remove the suffix then. Thanks you both
for the feedback.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>> -Daniel
>>
>
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Software Engineer
New Platform Technologies Enablement team
RHEL Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists