linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Introduce delegated xfers support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <659c2f2c-e236-1a70-44be-c5f6871868e7@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 May 2021 19:20:45 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     sudeep.holla@....com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
        Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, etienne.carriere@...aro.org,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, souvik.chakravarty@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Introduce delegated xfers support



On 5/24/2021 4:15 PM, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Introduce optional support for delegated xfers allocation.
> 
> An SCMI transport can optionally declare to support delegated xfers and
> then use a few helper functions exposed by the core SCMI transport layer to
> query the core for existing in-flight transfers matching a provided message
> header or alternatively and transparently obtain a brand new xfer to handle
> a freshly received notification message.
> In both cases the obtained xfer is uniquely mapped into a specific xfer
> through the means of the message header acting as key.
> 
> In this way such a transport can properly store its own transport specific
> payload into the xfer uniquely associated to the message header before
> even calling into the core scmi_rx_callback() in the usual way, so that
> the transport specific message envelope structures can be freed early
> and there is no more need to keep track of their status till the core
> fully processes the xfer to completion or times out.
> 
> The scmi_rx_callbak() does not need to be modified to carry additional
> transport-specific ancillary data related to such message envelopes since
> an unique natural association is established between the xfer and the
> related message header.
> 
> Existing transports that do not need anything of the above will continue
> to work as before without any change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>

It would be better to see this in the context of its planned user, but
that looked reasonable enough.
-- 
Florian