linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/rdmavt: Decouple QP and SGE lists allocations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d37c470d-8ff3-b1a4-58fa-e198de952b01@cornelisnetworks.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 May 2021 10:29:08 -0400
From:   Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        "Marciniszyn, Mike" <mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/rdmavt: Decouple QP and SGE lists
 allocations

On 5/25/21 10:20 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> We are already mid 5.13 cycle. So the earliest this could be queued up to go
>> in is 5.14. Can this wait one more cycle? If we can't get it tested/proven
>> to make a difference mid 5.14, we will drop the objection and Leon's patch
>> can go ahead in for 5.15. Fair compromise?
> 
> Fine, but the main question is if you can use normal memory policy
> settings, not this.

Agreed.

-Denny