[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJQfnxG1Q=6n4H_kTbFA-=b0Rbs6v7WE8mKKonqvw-nXhLnLMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 22:34:07 +0800
From: Archie Pusaka <apusaka@...gle.com>
To: Emil Lenngren <emil.lenngren@...il.com>
Cc: linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
CrosBT Upstreaming <chromeos-bluetooth-upstreaming@...omium.org>,
Archie Pusaka <apusaka@...omium.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>,
Miao-chen Chou <mcchou@...omium.org>,
Ole Bjørn Midtbø <omidtbo@...co.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Bluetooth: use inclusive language
Hi Emil,
On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 20:19, Emil Lenngren <emil.lenngren@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Archie,
>
> Den tis 25 maj 2021 kl 12:46 skrev Archie Pusaka <apusaka@...gle.com>:
> >
> > From: Archie Pusaka <apusaka@...omium.org>
> >
> > Hi linux-bluetooth maintainers,
> >
> > This series contains inclusive language patches, to promote usage of
> > central, peripheral, reject list, and accept list. I tried to divide
> > the change to several smaller patches to ease downstreamers to make
> > gradual change.
> >
> > There are still three occurences in debugfs (patch 09/12) in which the
> > original less inclusive terms is still left as-is since it is a
> > file name, and I afraid replacing them will cause instability to
> > other systems depending on that file name.
> >
> >
> > Archie Pusaka (12):
> > Bluetooth: use inclusive language in HCI role
> > Bluetooth: use inclusive language in hci_core.h
> > Bluetooth: use inclusive language to describe CPB
> > Bluetooth: use inclusive language in HCI LE features
> > Bluetooth: use inclusive language in L2CAP
> > Bluetooth: use inclusive language in RFCOMM
> > Bluetooth: use inclusive language when tracking connections
> > Bluetooth: use inclusive language in SMP
> > Bluetooth: use inclusive language in debugfs
> > Bluetooth: use inclusive language when filtering devices out
> > Bluetooth: use inclusive language when filtering devices in
> > Bluetooth: use inclusive language in comments
> >
> > include/net/bluetooth/hci.h | 98 +++++++++++++-------------
> > include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h | 22 +++---
> > include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h | 2 +-
> > include/net/bluetooth/mgmt.h | 2 +-
> > include/net/bluetooth/rfcomm.h | 2 +-
> > net/bluetooth/amp.c | 2 +-
> > net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c | 32 ++++-----
> > net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 46 ++++++-------
> > net/bluetooth/hci_debugfs.c | 20 +++---
> > net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 114 +++++++++++++++----------------
> > net/bluetooth/hci_request.c | 106 ++++++++++++++--------------
> > net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c | 12 ++--
> > net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c | 2 +-
> > net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 16 ++---
> > net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 4 +-
> > net/bluetooth/mgmt.c | 36 +++++-----
> > net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c | 4 +-
> > net/bluetooth/smp.c | 86 +++++++++++------------
> > net/bluetooth/smp.h | 6 +-
> > 19 files changed, 309 insertions(+), 303 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.31.1.818.g46aad6cb9e-goog
> >
>
> Interesting move and good initiative!
>
> In my opinion however, shouldn't we wait until Bluetooth SIG changes
> the naming in the specification itself first (or rather push them to
> make the changes in the first place)? If they are about to change
> names, it would be good to make sure we end up with the same word
> choices so that we don't call one thing "le peripheral initiated
> feature exchange" while the standard calls it "le follower initiated
> feature exchange" or similar. Using different terminology than what's
> specified by the standard could easily end up in confusion I guess,
> and even more if different stacks invented their own alternative
> terminology.
So far the Bluetooth SIG has only published an "Appropriate Language
Mapping Table" (https://specificationrefs.bluetooth.com/language-mapping/Appropriate_Language_Mapping_Table.pdf).
It doesn't look like it's finalized, but it's enough to get started.
Hopefully someone in the community can help to push the changes to the
spec?
> In any case, I'm for example not sure if central/peripheral are the
> best words to use, since those are tied to a specific higher level
> profile (Generic Access Profile) and those words are not mentioned at
> all in the spec outside that context. The SMP chapter for example uses
> the terminology "initiator" and "responder", so maybe those are better
> word choices, at least in SMP.
Thanks, you are correct about that. I didn't read the spec thoroughly
and just did a simple replacement. I shall incorporate your suggestion
if this set of patches is greenlighted.
Cheers,
Archie
Powered by blists - more mailing lists