[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJXK7ccGQd0KFQpuEx8nSaBMufw2fyVyXyX=ErP2xgFjHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 16:34:40 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...iqon.com>
Cc: linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: gpio-tps65910: remove platform_set_drvdata() +
cleanup probe
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:17 PM Alexandru Ardelean
<aardelean@...iqon.com> wrote:
>
> The platform_set_drvdata() call is only useful if we need to retrieve back
> the private information.
> Since the driver doesn't do that, it's not useful to have it.
>
> If this is removed, we can also just do a direct return on
> devm_gpiochip_add_data(). We don't need to print that this call failed as
> there are other ways to log/see this during probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...iqon.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c | 12 ++----------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c
> index 0c0b445c75c0..7fa8c841081f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c
> @@ -165,16 +165,8 @@ static int tps65910_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> skip_init:
> - ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &tps65910_gpio->gpio_chip,
> - tps65910_gpio);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not register gpiochip, %d\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, tps65910_gpio);
> -
> - return ret;
> + return devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &tps65910_gpio->gpio_chip,
> + tps65910_gpio);
> }
>
> static struct platform_driver tps65910_gpio_driver = {
> --
> 2.31.1
>
Applied, thanks!
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists