linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 30/63] ASoC: rt5645: add error checking to rt5645

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 May 2021 16:44:17 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 30/63] ASoC: rt5645: add error checking to
 rt5645_probe function

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 03:01:40PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 10:45:47AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > From: Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
> > 
> > [ Upstream commit 5e70b8e22b64eed13d5bbebcb5911dae65bf8c6b ]
> > 
> > Check for return value from various snd_soc_dapm_* calls, as many of
> > them can return errors and this should be handled. Also, reintroduce
> > the allocation failure check for rt5645->eq_param as well. Make all
> 
> I also don't have this commit and can't see any sign of it
> having been submitted upstream.

I cc:ed you on it, as it was part of the larger "revert the umn.edu"
mess.  It's now in 5.13-rc3.

thanks,

greg k-h