[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VwhMQ3wV0AsB1cbb3j6q3WzJS=DftUc0MRbTKi8uBs6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 08:04:12 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Seth LaForge <sethml@...gle.com>,
Ricky Liang <jcliang@...omium.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: perf: Make compat tracing better
Catalin / Will,
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 1:55 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> The goal for this series is to improve "perf" behavior when 32-bit
> userspace code is involved. This turns out to be fairly important for
> Chrome OS which still runs 32-bit userspace for the time being (long
> story there).
>
> I won't repeat everything said in the individual patches since since
> they are wordy enough as it is.
>
> Please enjoy and I hope this isn't too ugly/hacky for inclusion in
> mainline.
>
> Thanks to Nick Desaulniers for his early review of these patches and
> to Ricky for the super early prototype that some of this is based on.
>
>
> Douglas Anderson (3):
> arm64: perf: perf_callchain_user() compat support for
> clang/non-APCS-gcc-arm
> arm64: perf: Improve compat perf_callchain_user() for clang leaf
> functions
> arm64: perf: Add a config option saying 32-bit thumb code uses R11 for
> FP
>
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 12 ++
> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 329 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 305 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
While this isn't massively urgent, I'd like to confirm that this is on
your plate to eventually review and/or land. If it's not, do you have
any suggestions for how I should proceed?
Thanks!
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists