linux-kernel - Re: x86/fpu/xsave: protection key test failures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ab564da6-1029-1dab-d54e-a266a623974f@amd.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 May 2021 10:25:50 -0500
From:   Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, shuah@...nel.org, jroedel@...e.de,
        ubizjak@...il.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jpa@....mail.kapsi.fi,
        fenghua.yu@...el.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rppt@...nel.org, Fan_Yang@...u.edu.cn,
        anshuman.khandual@....com, b.thiel@...teo.de, jgross@...e.com,
        keescook@...omium.org, seanjc@...gle.com, mh@...ndium.org,
        sashal@...nel.org, krisman@...labora.com, chang.seok.bae@...el.com,
        0x7f454c46@...il.com, jhubbard@...dia.com, sandipan@...ux.ibm.com,
        ziy@...dia.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
        suxingxing@...ngson.cn, harish@...ux.ibm.com,
        rong.a.chen@...el.com, linuxram@...ibm.com, bauerman@...ux.ibm.com,
        dave.kleikamp@...cle.com
Subject: Re: x86/fpu/xsave: protection key test failures



On 5/25/21 7:20 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 5/25/21 5:03 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>>> What values do PKRU and the shadow have when the test fails?  Is PKRU 0?
>> It goes back to default value 0x55555554. The test is expecting it to be
>> 0. Printed them below.
>>
>> test_ptrace_of_child()::1346, pkey_reg: 0x0000000055555554 shadow:
>> 0000000000000000
>> protection_keys_64: pkey-helpers.h:127: _read_pkey_reg: Assertion
>> `pkey_reg == shadow_pkey_reg' failed.
> 
> That's backwards (shadow vs pkru) from what I was expecting.
> 
> Can you turn on all the debuging?
> 
> Just compile with -DDEBUG_LEVEL=5
> 


Copied the logs at https://pastebin.com/gtQiHg8Q