[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNOOW6-8su=VNipvb7ztQ0TdF9THn+yeWepz7D7BAL418Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 19:50:41 +0200
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Add compile-time asserts for siginfo_t offsets
On Wed, 26 May 2021 at 19:42, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 09:07:34PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > To help catch ABI breaks at compile-time, add compile-time assertions to
> > verify the siginfo_t layout.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
>
> Do you want me to queue this patch in the arm64 tree, or is the series all
> going together via another route?
I think Eric will queue them together with a bunch of other cleanups,
because as-is these patches are out-of-date as of:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a0e31f3a38e77612ed8967aaad28db6d3ee674b5
Thanks,
-- Marco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists