linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] can: mcp251xfd: Fix header block to clarify independence from OF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 May 2021 22:32:08 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Kopp <thomas.kopp@...rochip.com>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] can: mcp251xfd: Fix header block to clarify
 independence from OF

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 09:22:14PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 26.05.2021 22:18:01, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The driver is neither dependent on OF, nor it requires any OF headers.
> > Fix header block to clarify independence from OF.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Does it already work on ACPI?

Nope.

> Applied to linux-can-next/testing.

Please, scratch this (because of above).

I'll send out a v2 shortly.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko