[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210526134321.42bbd4a9dcbcf53e855c5b1b@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 13:43:21 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next] mm/memcontrol.c: Fix potential uninitialized
variable warning
On Wed, 26 May 2021 15:36:02 -0400 Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
> If the -Wno-maybe-uninitialized gcc option is not specified, compilation
> of memcontrol.c may generate the following warnings:
>
> mm/memcontrol.c: In function ‘refill_obj_stock’:
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:127:17: warning: ‘flags’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> return !(flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF);
> ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> mm/memcontrol.c:3216:16: note: ‘flags’ was declared here
> unsigned long flags;
> ^~~~~
> In file included from mm/memcontrol.c:29:
> mm/memcontrol.c: In function ‘uncharge_page’:
> ./include/linux/memcontrol.h:797:2: warning: ‘objcg’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> percpu_ref_put(&objcg->refcnt);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Fix that by properly initializing *pflags in get_obj_stock() and
> introducing a use_objcg bool variable in uncharge_page() to avoid
> potentially accessing the struct page data twice.
>
Thanks. I'll queue this as a fix against your "mm/memcg: optimize user
context object stock access".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists