linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] clk: qcom: gcc-sdm660: Account for needed adjustments in probe function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 May 2021 15:32:19 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, martin.botka@...ainline.org,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org,
        marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>,
        Craig Tatlor <ctatlor97@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] clk: qcom: gcc-sdm660: Account for needed adjustments in probe function

Quoting Konrad Dybcio (2021-05-26 12:11:13)
> Hi,
> 
> 
> I am aware that the comments I left are highly controversial and a bit emotional, but I'd still like to get a response. It's been almost two months and I have phones on the desk waiting for things to be merged, so that I can develop more things.
> 
> 
> P.S. I still stand by my stance that the more info we can get about what's going on in the black boxes that we are not allowed to get docs for, the better for us, developers.
> 

I marked this patch as "changes requested". Please make the changes
requested.