[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210526005651.12652-1-samirweng1979@163.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 08:56:51 +0800
From: samirweng1979 <samirweng1979@....com>
To: krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com, davem@...emloft.net,
dinghao.liu@....edu.cn
Cc: linux-nfc@...ts.01.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] nfc: st95hf: remove unnecessary assignment and label
From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>
In function st95hf_in_send_cmd, the variable rc is assigned then goto
error label, which just returns rc, so we use return to replace it.
Since error label only used once in the function, so we remove error label.
Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>
---
drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
index 4578547..88924be 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
@@ -926,10 +926,8 @@ static int st95hf_in_send_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev,
int len_data_to_tag = 0;
skb_resp = nfc_alloc_recv_skb(MAX_RESPONSE_BUFFER_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!skb_resp) {
- rc = -ENOMEM;
- goto error;
- }
+ if (!skb_resp)
+ return -ENOMEM;
switch (stcontext->current_rf_tech) {
case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_106A:
@@ -986,7 +984,6 @@ static int st95hf_in_send_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev,
free_skb_resp:
kfree_skb(skb_resp);
-error:
return rc;
}
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists