[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d6f1040-6c96-7d1d-c766-5fb0057e1cc4@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 09:51:34 +0800
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] perf mem: Support record for hybrid platform
Hi Jiri,
On 5/25/2021 3:39 PM, Jin, Yao wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
>>>> rec_argv = calloc(rec_argc + 1, sizeof(char *));
>>>> if (!rec_argv)
>>>> return -1;
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Save the allocated event name strings.
>>>> + */
>>>> + rec_tmp = calloc(rec_argc + 1, sizeof(char *));
>>>> + if (!rec_tmp) {
>>>> + free(rec_argv);
>>>> + return -1;
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> why not do strdup on all of them and always call free instead?
>>> that would get rid of the rec_tmp and tmp_nr
>>>
>>
>> That is also one method. Let me try it.
>>
>
> If we do strdup on all of them, such as,
>
> if (e->record)
> rec_argv[i++] = strdup("-W");
>
> rec_argv[i++] = strdup("-d");
>
> if (mem->phys_addr)
> rec_argv[i++] = strdup("--phys-data");
> ....
>
> That looks too much strdup used here. So I choose to use a rec_tmp[] to record the allocated string
> and free them before exit the function.
>
> Or we record the start index and end index in rec_argv[] for the allocated event string, use strdup
> on them and call free before exit the function.
>
This method looks also not OK.
The rec_argv[] is changed in cmd_record() for some complex command lines.
For example,
./perf mem record -- ./memtest -R0d -b2000 -d64 -n100
Before cmd_record(), rec_argv[3] = "-e".
After cmd_record(), rec_argv[3] = "-d64"
Even we do strdup on all of rec_argv[], but the entries are probably changed in cmd_record(), so we
can't free the entries at the end of __cmd_record().
Maybe we have to use the original way which just records the allocated event string to a temporary
array and free the whole array at the end of __cmd_record().
What do you think?
Thanks
Jin Yao
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks
> Jin Yao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists