linux-kernel - [PATCH] sched: fair: don't depend on wake_wide if waker and wakee are already in same LLC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210526091057.1800-1-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 May 2021 21:10:57 +1200
From:   Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>
To:     <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
        <peterz@...radead.org>, <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <bsegall@...gle.com>, <mgorman@...e.de>
CC:     <valentin.schneider@....com>, <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        <bristot@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <guodong.xu@...aro.org>, <yangyicong@...wei.com>,
        <tangchengchang@...wei.com>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: fair: don't depend on wake_wide if waker and wakee are already in same LLC

when waker and wakee are already in the same LLC, it is pointless to worry
about the competition caused by pulling wakee to waker's LLC domain.

Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 3248e24a90b0..cfb1bd47acc3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6795,7 +6795,15 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int wake_flags)
 			new_cpu = prev_cpu;
 		}
 
-		want_affine = !wake_wide(p) && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr);
+		/*
+		 * we use wake_wide to make smarter pull and avoid cruel
+		 * competition because of jam-packed tasks in waker's LLC
+		 * domain. But if waker and wakee have been already in
+		 * same LLC domain, it seems it is pointless to depend
+		 * on wake_wide
+		 */
+		want_affine = (cpus_share_cache(cpu, prev_cpu) || !wake_wide(p)) &&
+				cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr);
 	}
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-- 
2.25.1