linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched/topology: Fix a spelling mistake in error message

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <42d36255-c1a6-956a-b56b-0c09eee125ec@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 25 May 2021 19:32:34 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched/topology: Fix a spelling mistake in error
 message

On 5/25/21 7:18 PM, Zhen Lei wrote:
> The misspelled word 'borken' should be 'broken'.
> 
> Fixes: 6ae72dff3759 ("sched: Robustify topology setup")
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/topology.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index 55a0a243e871..80295e224442 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -1937,7 +1937,7 @@ static struct sched_domain *build_sched_domain(struct sched_domain_topology_leve
>  
>  		if (!cpumask_subset(sched_domain_span(child),
>  				    sched_domain_span(sd))) {
> -			pr_err("BUG: arch topology borken\n");
> +			pr_err("BUG: arch topology broken\n");

Would "borked" or "b0rken" be clearer?

>  #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
>  			pr_err("     the %s domain not a subset of the %s domain\n",
>  					child->name, sd->name);
> 


I.e., this is misspelt on purpose.

Reply to a previous version of this patch:
  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1493036801.6266.12.camel@gmx.de/

cheers.
-- 
~Randy