linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] clk: actions: Fix AHPPREDIV-H-AHB clock chain on Owl S500 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 May 2021 15:42:30 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...il.com>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Edgar Bernardi Righi <edgar.righi@...tec.org.br>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] clk: actions: Fix AHPPREDIV-H-AHB clock chain on Owl
 S500 SoC

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 08:50:14PM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:15:47AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 07:18:29PM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> > > There are a few issues with the setup of the Actions Semi Owl S500 SoC's
> > > clock chain involving AHPPREDIV, H and AHB clocks:
> > > 
> > > * AHBPREDIV clock is defined as a muxer only, although it also acts as
> > >   a divider.
> > > * H clock is defined as a standard divider, although the raw value zero
> > >   is not supported.
> > 
> > What do you mean by not supported? The datasheet lists "0" as the valid divisor
> > value for divide by 1.
> 
> Unfortunately CMU_BUSCLK1 is not documented in my S500 Datasheet
> (Version: 1.6, 2016-03-07). Do you have a newer (or a more official)
> one?
> 

Yes I do have a newer version of the datasheet (v1.8) and there I can
see the divisor 0.

> The reference xapp-le code snipped is:
> 
> static struct owl_div divider_H_CLK = {
>     .type = DIV_T_NATURE,
>     .range_from = 1,  /* reserve H_CLK divsor 1 */
>     .range_to = 3,
>     .reg = &divbit_H_CLK,
> };
> 
> Not sure why divisor 1 has been reserved..
> 

It is not as per the datasheet. Did you run into any issues with this?
Else I'd suggest to keep it as it is.

Thanks,
Mani

> Thanks,
> Cristi
> 
> > Rest looks good to me.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Mani
> > 
> [...]