lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 26 May 2021 12:48:47 +0200
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] slub: Force on no_hash_pointers when slub_debug is
 enabled

On 5/26/21 4:56 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Obscuring the pointers that slub shows when debugging makes for some
> confusing slub debug messages:
> 
>  Padding overwritten. 0x0000000079f0674a-0x000000000d4dce17
> 
> Those addresses are hashed for kernel security reasons. If we're trying
> to be secure with slub_debug on the commandline we have some big
> problems given that we dump whole chunks of kernel memory to the kernel
> logs. Let's force on the no_hash_pointers commandline flag when
> slub_debug is on the commandline. This makes slub debug messages more
> meaningful and if by chance a kernel address is in some slub debug
> object dump we will have a better chance of figuring out what went
> wrong.
> 
> Note that we don't use %px in the slub code because we want to reduce
> the number of places that %px is used in the kernel. This also nicely
> prints a big fat warning at kernel boot if slub_debug is on the
> commandline so that we know that this kernel shouldn't be used on
> production systems.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> ---
> 
> I opted for extern because I guess we don't want to advertise
> no_hash_pointers_enable() in some sort of header file? It can be put in
> a header file

Hm looks like the bots disagree. I suppose a declaration right above definition
in lib/vsprintf.c would silence them, but I'll leave it to printk maintainers if
they would prefer that way or traditionally
include/linux/kernel.h

> but I see that the no_hash_pointers variable is also not 
> in a header file but exported as symbol.

Yeah it's only used by tests, and a variable doesn't need separate declaration.

>  lib/vsprintf.c | 2 +-
>  mm/slub.c      | 6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
> index f0c35d9b65bf..cc281f5895f9 100644
> --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> @@ -2186,7 +2186,7 @@ char *fwnode_string(char *buf, char *end, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>  bool no_hash_pointers __ro_after_init;
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(no_hash_pointers);
>  
> -static int __init no_hash_pointers_enable(char *str)
> +int __init no_hash_pointers_enable(char *str)
>  {
>  	if (no_hash_pointers)
>  		return 0;
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index bf4949115412..1c30436d3e6c 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -4451,6 +4451,8 @@ static struct kmem_cache * __init bootstrap(struct kmem_cache *static_cache)
>  	return s;
>  }
>  
> +extern int no_hash_pointers_enable(char *str);
> +
>  void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
>  {
>  	static __initdata struct kmem_cache boot_kmem_cache,
> @@ -4470,6 +4472,10 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
>  	for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY)
>  		node_set(node, slab_nodes);
>  
> +	/* Print slub debugging pointers without hashing */
> +	if (static_branch_unlikely(&slub_debug_enabled))
> +		no_hash_pointers_enable(NULL);
> +
>  	create_boot_cache(kmem_cache_node, "kmem_cache_node",
>  		sizeof(struct kmem_cache_node), SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, 0, 0);
>  
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ