lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 26 May 2021 15:21:00 +0200
From:   Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com>
To:     dhowells@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc:     phillip@...ashfs.org.uk, squashfs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Squashfs on ubi blockdev

Hi,

After: 5a2be1288b514 ("vfs: Convert squashfs to use the new mount API")

We see this; when mounting a squashfs from a ubiblockdev:
root@...26-v2:/data/root# mount /dev/ubiblock0_6 /mnt

[   39.884295] /dev/ubiblock0_6: Can't open blockdev

But the filesystem is mounted anyway...

I have tried checking the returned error code get_tree_bdev() -> blkdev_get_by_path() returns -EROFS.

I have also tried to see what happens in squashfs_get_tree() it will be re-run with the ro option set.
Which explains why the filesystem ends up mouted.
[   39.889461] ####Custom debug: squashfs_get_tree -30


[   39.906309] ####Custom debug: squashfs_get_tree 0


Fair enough it's after all a squashfs :)

But could the error message be better? Or just filter out the print when getting a EROFS?

Br,
/Sean

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ