lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YK/a8f7MhO2SlrMS@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 May 2021 10:46:25 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     Austin Kim <austindh.kim@...il.com>
Cc:     herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
        john.johansen@...onical.com, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, austin.kim@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: arm64/gcm - remove Wunused-const-variable
 ghash_cpu_feature

On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 07:28:09AM +0100, Austin Kim wrote:
> 
> The variable with MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() is registered as platform_driver.

What does this mean?  There is no platform_driver involved here at all.

> But ghash_cpu_feature is not used, so remove ghash_cpu_feature.

It is used when the file is built as a module.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-glue.c b/arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-glue.c
> index 720cd3a58da3..c3f27d0d5329 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-glue.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-glue.c
> @@ -615,10 +615,5 @@ static void __exit ghash_ce_mod_exit(void)
>  		crypto_unregister_shash(&ghash_alg);
>  }
>  
> -static const struct cpu_feature ghash_cpu_feature[] = {
> -	{ cpu_feature(PMULL) }, { }
> -};
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(cpu, ghash_cpu_feature);
> -

Probably adding __maybe_unused to ghash_cpu_feature[] is the right thing to do.
That's what module_cpu_feature_match() does.

(Note that module_cpu_feature_match() can't be used here, as it seems the intent
is for this module to be autoloaded when PMULL is detected, but still be
loadable without it.  So, that's apparently the reason for using
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() directly.)

- Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ