[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210527061603.cuy5q2jo3pfom7vf@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 11:46:03 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
Cc: ulf.hansson@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, swboyd@...omium.org,
rojay@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: power: Introduce
'assigned-performance-states' property
On 27-05-21, 11:42, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> While most devices within power-domains which support performance states,
> scale the performance state dynamically, some devices might want to
> set a static/default performance state while the device is active.
> These devices typically would also run off a fixed clock and not support
> dynamically scaling the device's performance, also known as DVFS techniques.
> Add a property 'assigned-performance-states' which client devices can
> use to set this default performance state on their power-domains.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
> index aed51e9..88cebf2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
> @@ -66,6 +66,19 @@ properties:
> by the given provider should be subdomains of the domain specified
> by this binding.
>
> + assigned-performance-states:
Why is this named assigned and not "default"? Just curious :)
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists