linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e6523755-b0ac-c31f-d640-dd016fb8eff1@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 May 2021 14:49:25 +0800
From:   Jie Deng <jie.deng@...el.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        conghui.chen@...el.com, kblaiech@...lanox.com,
        jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
        Sergey Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, loic.poulain@...aro.org,
        Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        yu1.wang@...el.com, shuo.a.liu@...el.com,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver


On 2021/4/15 16:18, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 04:15:07PM +0800, Jie Deng wrote:
>> On 2021/4/15 15:28, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>
>>>> Now that we were able to catch you, I will use the opportunity to
>>>> clarify the doubts I had.
>>>>
>>>> - struct mutex lock in struct virtio_i2c, I don't think this is
>>>>     required since the core takes care of locking in absence of this.
>>> This is likely correct.
>> OK. Then I will remove the lock.
> Let me have a look first, please.


Hi Wolfram,

I didn't receive your feedback yet. Do you have any more comments ?

Thanks.