linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 05/18] iommu/ioasid: Redefine IOASID set and allocation APIs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YK8m9jNuvEzlXWlu@yekko>
Date:   Thu, 27 May 2021 14:58:30 +1000
From:   David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc:     Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@...el.com>,
        "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 05/18] iommu/ioasid: Redefine IOASID set and
 allocation APIs

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 04:52:57PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 12:56:30AM +0530, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
> 
> > 2. iommu backed mdev devices for SRIOV where mdev device is created per
> > VF (mdev device == VF device) then that mdev device has same iommu
> > protection scope as VF associated to it. 
> 
> This doesn't require, and certainly shouldn't create, a fake group.

It's only fake if you start with a narrow view of what a group is.  A
group is a set of devices (in the kernel sense of "device", not
necessarily the hardware sense) which can't be isolated from each
other.  The mdev device is a kernel device, and if working as intended
it can be isolated from everything else, and is therefore in an
absolute bona fide group of its own.

> Only the VF's real IOMMU group should be used to model an iommu domain
> linked to a VF. Injecting fake groups that are proxies for real groups
> only opens the possibility of security problems like David is
> concerned with.

It's not a proxy for a real group, it's a group of its own.  If you
discover that (due to a hardware bug, for example) the mdev is *not*
properly isolated from its parent PCI device, then both the mdev
virtual device *and* the physical PCI device are in the same group.
Groups including devices of different types and on different buses
were considered from the start, and are precedented, if rare.

> Max's series approaches this properly by fully linking the struct
> pci_device of the VF throughout the entire VFIO scheme, including the
> group and container, while still allowing override of various VFIO
> operations.
> 
> Jason
> 

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)