[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3573cd8-a4c8-43c2-be66-8b74d688a406@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 15:23:06 +0800
From: Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: will@...nel.org
Cc: fweisbec@...il.com, john.stultz@...aro.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lorenzo@...gle.com, maz@...nel.org,
mika.penttila@...tfour.com, sboyd@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] tick/broadcast: Split
__tick_broadcast_oneshot_control() into a helper
Hi will:
I had backport you tick/broadcast: Prefer per-cpu relatives
patches,
but i did not get the true result, the Wakeup Devices are all null, why?
my machine is armv8-a arm64
#cat current_clocksource
arch_sys_counter
my local clock event is
Tick Device: mode: 1
Per CPU device: 95
Clock Event Device: arch_sys_timer
max_delta_ns: 21474836451
min_delta_ns: 1000
mult: 429496730
shift: 32
mode: 3
next_event: 14951080000000 nsecs
set_next_event: arch_timer_set_next_event_phys
shutdown: arch_timer_shutdown_phys
oneshot stopped: arch_timer_shutdown_phys
event_handler: hrtimer_interrupt
retries: 70
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
cat /proc/timer_list | grep "Wakeup Device:"
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
Wakeup Device: <NULL>
--
Best Regards!
Xin Hao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists