linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 07/33] mm: Add folio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YK9T9xXaF6kU0nmU@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 27 May 2021 09:10:31 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 07/33] mm: Add folio_get

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 03:24:26PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 01:56:46PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > Nitpick: function names in subject should IMHO also end with (). But not a
> > reason for resend all patches that don't...
> 
> Hm, I thought it was preferred to not do that.  I can fix it
> easily enough when I go through and add the R-b.

I hate the pointless ().  Some maintainers insist on it.   No matter
what you do you'll make some folks happy and others not.