linux-kernel - Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 2/4] fuse: Fix infinite loop in sget

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 May 2021 12:08:36 +0200
From:   Max Reitz <mreitz@...hat.com>
To:     Greg Kurz <groug@...d.org>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        virtio-fs@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 2/4] fuse: Fix infinite loop in sget_fc()

On 25.05.21 17:02, Greg Kurz wrote:
> We don't set the SB_BORN flag on submounts. This is wrong as these
> superblocks are then considered as partially constructed or dying
> in the rest of the code and can break some assumptions.
> 
> One such case is when you have a virtiofs filesystem with submounts
> and you try to mount it again : virtio_fs_get_tree() tries to obtain
> a superblock with sget_fc(). The logic in sget_fc() is to loop until
> it has either found an existing matching superblock with SB_BORN set
> or to create a brand new one. It is assumed that a superblock without
> SB_BORN is transient and should go away. Forgetting to set SB_BORN on
> submounts hence causes sget_fc() to retry forever.
> 
> Setting SB_BORN requires special care, i.e. a write barrier for
> super_cache_count() which can check SB_BORN without taking any lock.
> We should call vfs_get_tree() to deal with that but this requires
> to have a proper ->get_tree() implementation for submounts, which
> is a bigger piece of work. Go for a simple bug fix in the meatime.
> 
> Fixes: bf109c64040f ("fuse: implement crossmounts")
> Cc: mreitz@...hat.com
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.10+
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@...d.org>
> ---
>   fs/fuse/dir.c | 10 ++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dir.c b/fs/fuse/dir.c
> index 01559061cbfb..3b0482738741 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c
> @@ -346,6 +346,16 @@ static struct vfsmount *fuse_dentry_automount(struct path *path)
>   		goto out_put_sb;
>   	}
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * FIXME: setting SB_BORN requires a write barrier for
> +	 *        super_cache_count(). We should actually come
> +	 *        up with a proper ->get_tree() implementation
> +	 *        for submounts and call vfs_get_tree() to take
> +	 *        care of the write barrier.
> +	 */
> +	smp_wmb();
> +	sb->s_flags |= SB_BORN;
> +

I’m not sure whether we should have the order be exactly the same as in 
vfs_get_tree(), i.e. whether this should be put after fsc->root has been 
set.  Or maybe even after fm has been added to fc->mounts, because that 
too was part of the fuse_get_tree_submount() function of your “fuse: 
Call vfs_get_tree() for submounts” patch.

 From a quick look at SB_BORN users, it doesn’t seem to make a 
difference to me, though, so:

Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@...hat.com>

>   	sb->s_flags |= SB_ACTIVE;
>   	fsc->root = dget(sb->s_root);
>   	/* We are done configuring the superblock, so unlock it */
>