lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 27 May 2021 19:10:16 +0900
From:   Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>
To:     Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...gle.com>
Cc:     Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>,
        Andrew-CT Chen <andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com>,
        Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@...iatek.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/14] media: mtk-vcodec: venc: support START and STOP commands

On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 10:37 PM Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:31 PM Alexandre Courbot
> <acourbot@...omium.org> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>
> > [hsinyi: fix double-free issue if flush buffer was not dequeued by the
> > time streamoff is called]
> > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
>
> Per guideline[1]:
> > Notably, the last Signed-off-by: must always be that of the developer submitting the patch.
>
> In the case, should you provide another signed-off at the last line?
>
> [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by

IIUC the main author's signoff should come first, and you should not
sign patches twice. checkpatch.pl did not raise any objection, so I
suppose the current form is correct?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ