[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YK+J5oy1qH6dWAmG@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 14:00:38 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: eli.billauer@...il.com
Cc: arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] char: xillybus: Add driver for XillyUSB (Xillybus
variant for USB)
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 01:03:11PM +0300, eli.billauer@...il.com wrote:
> From: Eli Billauer <eli.billauer@...il.com>
>
> The XillyUSB driver is the USB variant for the Xillybus FPGA IP core.
> Even though it presents a nearly identical API on the FPGA and host,
> it's almost a complete rewrite of the driver: The framework for exchanging
> data on a USB bus is fundamentally different from doing the same with a
> PCIe interface, which leaves very little in common between the existing
> driver and the new one for XillyUSB.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eli Billauer <eli.billauer@...il.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> Changelog:
>
> v5:
> - Move xillyusb.c back from staging to char/xillybus/
> - Turn previously lockless FIFO into one relying on a lock
> - Set driver's soft_unbind flag, so that the device is notified when the
> driver is unloaded + due changes for killing URBs as required
> - Some refactoring of locks for better granularity
> - Avoid using pr_err and pr_warn, replace with dev_* counterparts
> - Bump MODULE_VERSION to 1.1
Nit, you should just remove the MODULE_VERSION() stuff, it makes no
sense once it is in the kernel tree to have them as they then mean
nothing.
But that can be an add-on patch, let me review these...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists