[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210527132442.GA26160@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 15:24:42 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Claire Chang <tientzu@...omium.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, mpe@...erman.id.au,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
sstabellini@...nel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
grant.likely@....com, xypron.glpk@....de,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>, mingo@...nel.org,
bauerman@...ux.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>, tfiga@...omium.org,
bskeggs@...hat.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, chris@...is-wilson.co.uk,
daniel@...ll.ch, airlied@...ux.ie, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
jxgao@...gle.com, joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
matthew.auld@...el.com, rodrigo.vivi@...el.com,
thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/15] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_create_debugfs
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:42:02PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> struct io_tlb_mem *io_tlb_default_mem;
> +static struct dentry *debugfs_dir;
>
> /*
> * Max segment that we can provide which (if pages are contingous) will
> @@ -662,18 +663,30 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_swiotlb_active);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
>
> +static void swiotlb_create_debugfs(struct io_tlb_mem *mem, const char *name)
> {
> if (!mem)
> + return;
I don't think this check makes much sense here.
> +}
> +
> +static int __init swiotlb_create_default_debugfs(void)
> +{
> + struct io_tlb_mem *mem = io_tlb_default_mem;
> +
> + if (mem) {
> + swiotlb_create_debugfs(mem, "swiotlb");
> + debugfs_dir = mem->debugfs;
> + } else {
> + debugfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir("swiotlb", NULL);
> + }
This also looks rather strange. I'd much rather create move the
directory creation of out swiotlb_create_debugfs. E.g. something like:
static void swiotlb_create_debugfs_file(struct io_tlb_mem *mem)
{
debugfs_create_ulong("io_tlb_nslabs", 0400, mem->debugfs, &mem->nslabs);
debugfs_create_ulong("io_tlb_used", 0400, mem->debugfs, &mem->used);
}
static int __init swiotlb_init_debugfs(void)
{
debugfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir("swiotlb", NULL);
if (io_tlb_default_mem) {
io_tlb_default_mem->debugfs = debugfs_dir;
swiotlb_create_debugfs_files(io_tlb_default_mem);
}
return 0;
}
late_initcall(swiotlb_init_debugfs);
...
static int rmem_swiotlb_device_init(struct reserved_mem *rmem,
struct device *dev)
{
...
mem->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(rmem->name, debugfs_dir);
swiotlb_create_debugfs_files(mem->debugfs);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists